Fatcow Icon
8 women face solicitation charges in prostitution arrests
Jan 25, 2013 | 38215 views | 9 9 comments | 20 20 recommendations | email to a friend | print
<p>Peggy Erks</p>

Peggy Erks

slideshow
Jennifer Shepherd
Jennifer Shepherd
slideshow
Ebony Underwood
Ebony Underwood
slideshow
Ashley Maynard-Apel
Ashley Maynard-Apel
slideshow
Chrissy Parsons
Chrissy Parsons
slideshow
Crissy Stapleton
Crissy Stapleton
slideshow
Carol King
Carol King
slideshow
Mechelle Smith
Mechelle Smith
slideshow

Frank Lewis

PDT Staff Writer

Eight area women are feeling the impact of a $480,000 grant given to the Portsmouth Police Department that has resulted in increased officer presence in the area. Among the crimes Portsmouth Police Chief Robert Ware said the department would target was prostitution and now the Portsmouth Police Department, with the assistance of the New Boston Police Department, have conducted an operation which led to the arrest of eight women related to prostitution.

The Department, using the federal grant funding, conducted the operation due to the continuing problem that plagues Portsmouth’s east end.

Arrested were Peggy Erks, 22; Jennifer Shepherd, 34; Ebony Underwood, 32; Mechelle Smith, 29; Chrissy Parsons, 29; Christie Stapleton, 24 and Carol King, 32, all of Portsmouth as well as Ashley Maynard-Apel, 33, of West Portsmouth. All are charged with one count of solicitation. King faces an additional charge of possession of drug abuse instruments.

All of the solicitation charges are a Misdemeanors of the Third Degree and if found guilty, each woman could face a maximum penalty of 60 days in jail and a $500 fine, in addition to any court cost. King also faces an additional 90 days in jail and $750 in fines for the drug abuse instrument charge.

Ware said the Portsmouth Police Department is committed to reducing these crimes and plans additional operations in the future in order to curb prostitution activity.

“The Department wishes to thank the Village of New Boston Police Department and those citizens who assisted us,” Ware said. “The contact person concerning these arrests is Detective Jim Charles. We ask that anyone with information on these, or any other crimes, call the Police Department at 740-353-4101.”

Ware said callers can remain anonymous and all information is kept confidential.

Frank Lewis may be reached at 740-353-3101, ext. 252, or at flewis@civitasmedia.com.



Comments
(9)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Hollaback
|
January 26, 2013
$480,00.00 grant to arrest 8 women who constantly walk the same area?? Are you serious.. Anyone at any given time could drive to the area and see these ladies and the johns. Why not arrest the johns too? We see them all the time. I know, it takes $480,00.00 more to arrest them!! Lmbo.. Why did it take a grant to arrest them?? Doesn't add up!!

How degrading and humiliating!!!

Why not plaster Marshall's mug on the paper when he deliberately drank and drove his automobile with an alcohol level far beyond the legal limits????

Ryanaaronbrl
|
January 26, 2013
I understand that this might be a problem but if the government has money to get ppl for a misdemeanor 3 why can't they try to find out who killed my brother in cold blood and is still running around free and me and my family sit everyday and cry I've done a lot in my past and I've payed for it by going to jail and prison but my brother never did anything wrong he just got out of the navy and this happens I just can't figure out if they have money for petty stuff why can't they find a murder he can kill again and it could be yours mine or there family all I'm saying is if there is money to get the streets clean then they. Can try to find a murder murder murder murder I'm glad they are cleaning up the streets keep up the good work but plz try to solve my brothers murder!!!!!!
yojoe
|
January 25, 2013
Now just how can they use that money and do this "extra" work. Bet they can't esplain that, what other work does not get done when they are doing this work, that they can't do regularly? Did they add more police and we can expect such arrests in the future, think not. Or do they milk more of the overtime budget for those annual 6 figure incomes? which is it, oh they will not explain it cause stupid is as stupid does.

YEAH, WHERE ARE THE JUDGES/JOHN'S, AND THE PIMP'S. HAH.

jsumms
|
January 25, 2013
C.C. you said "Even, for some ignorant reason, someone decided we needed half a million tax dollars to arrest 8 women and put then in jail for 60 days and make $500 in charges per pop."

the money was not given solely to arrest these women, it just allowed a heavier police presence which in turn resulted in arrests FINALLY! now I think the Johns should have been arrested too and their faces Plastered all over the news, I understand these women have families but they chose to do what they are doing, so they get no sympathy from me, nor I would say from very many other people. The Johns faces need to be plastered, because I have a feeling they would be extremely embarrassed to be busted for this, and may just maybe if they were busted often enough,these ladies would have to find another way to earn money, like maybe get a REAL job. I hate when I have to drive through that part of town, I am a female and I will tell you that they don't care who it is if you have to slow down for any reason they think you are interested and will try to approach your vehicle. Mr. Lewis was doing his job he is not to be faulted for reporting the truth.

Christian_Cabret
|
January 25, 2013
I completely understand that these ladies broke the law. I understand them getting arrested. Even, for some ignorant reason, someone decided we needed half a million tax dollars to arrest 8 women and put then in jail for 60 days and make $500 in charges per pop.

However, I think it pety to plaster their faces over the internet and in black and white print. It almost seems like slapping a scarlet letter on their chests. They are someone's daughter. They could be mothers. They could be sisters. I feel asamed that of all the news Lewis felt the need to cover that this was one. Shame on you, Mr. Lewis.

gotslots
|
January 26, 2013
Ha! Only in the PDT will this be considered a success! Mr. Lewis is doing what is required by the area, hating women who find a way of generating cash flow for themselves without the help or approval of society. As a four year resident of Charles Street I came to know some of these women, in one way or another; their familial histories are exactly what you would assume them to be. I have known Peggy since I moved to Portsmouth five years ago, she is one of the 'lost' people of the world. To see her listed in the newspaper in a way that would lead someone to believe her to be a person that is evil, deviant, cruel, selfish,etc; is wrong, belittling, shortsighted, and completely ignorant. Which is what I have come to expect from the 'leaders' of this area. I find myself, and my extended family, enjoying the misogynistic views that are prevalent in the media. Leave this area and you will see anyone else covering a story of this nature, be that person a man or woman, including as much background information on each of them as possible so as not to be the judge and jury, in the way that the PDT tends to be, tainting the views of the community.

These women are mere products of their environment. Lest we forget that some people are considered 'trash'. Regardless of the age that judgement is made about them, the label sticks. Some of us are more selective about how we choose what we consider what is and is not trash. I don't know about you, but I usually discard my trash.

That, dear reader, is what you are seeing. Trash, being discarded.
englishlarry
|
January 26, 2013
Wait a minute, eight women are arrested for committing a crime and that is somehow translates into the "leaders" and the paper perpetuating a misogynistic agenda? Eight less criminals on the street is a success no matter the sex of those individuals or how they ended up on the street in the first place. The next step is for someone to point out no johns were arrested. To arrest prostitutes you need undercover johns, to arrest johns you need undercover prostitutes. Which method do you think was deployed in this situation? Goslots, as a friend of these people, maybe you should have advised them that their illegal behavior would eventually catch up to them instead of lashing out against everyone except those responsible for the crime.
robstorm
|
January 25, 2013
Good lord! Them girls are ugly as a mud fence! Who in their right mind would pay them for sex? And why weren't any Johns arrested?
yojoe
|
January 25, 2013
Let's see your Pic, punk.........
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: