Fatcow Icon
Let’s Talk Poetry: Object Poems Redux
Dec 30, 2012 | 1201 views | 1 1 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Neil Carpathios

Contributing Columnist

In my last column, I discussed and shared two poems about ordinary, everyday objects. If you happened to read the column, you probably were left scratching your head.

As happens sometimes in the newspaper business, especially involving the rare appearance of poems, things can get messy. The newspaper might not be the ideal platform for poems, given its unique limitations and format requirements.

Still, I am grateful to be able to write this column, regardless. You see, the inherent challenges of putting poems in a newspaper are: space restrictions (which is why I can only include short poems), strange line arrangements (which is why I try to avoid using poems with staggered lines all over the page), and number of poems (which is why I limit the column to one or two short poems). Despite these considerations, problems can still occur.

The two poems last Sunday became merged together so that instead one poem about a fork and another about a doll, a single strange poem about a doll that resembled a fork (from hell, in fact) found itself printed—a sort of mutant poem with lines from both poems interspersed and jammed together (a sort of Frankenstein monster poem!). Although quite hilarious, this new poem-thing didn’t make much sense.

It reminded me of the old commercials for Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups where two people—one eating chocolate and the other eating peanut butter—are not paying attention and collide on the street only to find that the chocolate and peanut butter have also collided, turning the two separate treats into a wonderful new chocolate peanut butter candy, proving that sometimes amazing results can be born from unintentional experiments or occurrences. The poetry “experiment” from last week’s column was much less successful, I’m afraid.

So, here once again, are the TWO poems about objects. As I write this, I wonder if you will be reading the real poems, separately, or if yet another bizarre poem creature will find its way to the page (here goes, fingers crossed):

Fork

This strange thing must have crept

Right out of hell.

It resembles a bird’s foot

Worn around the cannibal’s neck.

As you hold it in your hand,

As you stab with it into a piece of meat,

It is possible to imagine the rest of the bird:

Its head which like your fist

Is large, bald, beakless and blind.

-Charles Simic

The Doll

When she was little

my sister loved this doll

until the paint flaked

from its bad luck eyes

and its cloth face, abraded,

bled cotton waste,

until its hair pulled loose

and its body became

a filthy sock,

a beaten stick,

dirt with ears.

And she cried, my sister did,

at what love could do.

-Brooke Horvath

The newspaper is as wonderful as peanut butter, and poetry is as wonderful as chocolate. Sometimes they work nicely together, sometimes not.

Address correspondence and poem submissions to: ncarpathios@shawnee.edu or Neil Carpathios, Shawnee State University, Dept. of English & Humanities, 940 Second Street, Portsmouth, OH 45662. (740-351-3478).



Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
mccleesem
|
January 03, 2013
Both poems resonate with a poignant tone that emerges differently in each. In "Fork," I feel a revulsion for the primitive practice of consuming meat. It recognizes - or reveals the act for what it is: basic and violent. The plight of the bird and the person eating it are in some ways similar - both are blind if in different ways. As a vegetarian, I feel the loss for both - the person the speaker addresses cannot see past his own desire for meat to the suffering caused by that desire.

The second poem makes those of us who had homemade dolls smile with the memory of how we literally "loved them to death." But, I am intrigued by the "bad luck eyes" phrase and the words with strong negative connotations like "bled," "filthy," and "beaten." There appears to be more behind the description of the destruction of the doll, but I am wary of misinterpreting the poem, much like "My Papa's Waltz" was 30 years ago. But, the sister crying at "what love could do," seems to say that love can be destructive and painful - which it can, of course. Still - love the poems and enjoy seeing them here! Thanks for sharing.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: